Fey Design, International Market Entry (NL & DK)

Fractional executive mandate leading Fey1926's international DTC market entry, focused on product–marketing alignment and conversion-first growth.

Fey Design, International Market Entry (NL & DK)

Active Mandate · Fractional Executive / Part-time CMO · Home & Living (DTC) · Germany / Netherlands / Denmark · 2024–2025

This project documents my work as a Fractional Executive supporting Fey 1926 (Fey Design) with the international direct-to-consumer market entry in the Netherlands and Denmark.

The mandate focused on aligning product strategy, conversion funnel design, and marketing channels to enable a profitable and scalable international launch for a highly configurable, premium product.

Context

  • Company: Fey1926 (Fey Boxspringbetten)
  • Industry: E-commerce, Home & Living (Box Spring Beds)
  • Geography: Germany (operations in Poland), market entry in the Netherlands (NL) and Denmark (DK)
  • Timeframe: Started in 2024 in preparation for the DTC website launch; active throughout 2025
  • Role & mandate: Fractional Executive / Part-time CMO, responsible for the implementation of the digitalization and internationalization strategy

Starting point

The international expansion was initiated under significant time and complexity pressure.

Key challenges at the start included:

  • No clearly defined, profitable market entry strategy for NL and DK
  • An imminent website launch (Jan/Feb 2025) requiring coordinated marketing, technical, and content readiness
  • An initial marketing plan (March 2025) that generated traffic and engagement, but failed to convert into sales
    • In the Netherlands, only one bed was sold — and subsequently returned
  • highly configurable product portfolio, which made it difficult to create standard, linkable products required for performance channels such as Google Shopping

From a metrics and planning perspective:

  • The target was to achieve profitability within 12 months, with a Marketing Efficiency (ME) of 20–25%
  • By late 2025, sales performance was weak and the overall direction of the setup was increasingly questioned

Key constraints included:

  • A fixed launch deadline (January 2025)
  • A sizeable first-year marketing budget (~€500k) requiring efficient allocation
  • Structural misalignment between product configuration logic and marketing channel requirements

Scope of responsibility

Responsible for

  • Strategic marketing & sales planning
    • Market entry preparation
    • Conversion funnel mapping
    • Defining channel-specific requirements (Google, Meta, TikTok, Influencer Marketing)
  • Media buying coordination
    • Steering and overseeing Google and Meta campaigns
    • Focusing on the transition from engagement to profitable sales
  • Technical product & platform coordination
    • Working with the IT agency on SEO optimizations
    • Quality assurance for website performance and configurator logic
  • Content & localization setup
    • Introducing and coordinating copywriters for English, Dutch, and Danish markets
  • Product–marketing alignment
    • Proposing structural changes to the product portfolio
    • Introducing standard collections and pre-configurations to enable efficient promotion

Explicitly not responsible for

  • Direct execution of media buying (handled by agencies and partners)
  • Full-time management of the internal team
  • Product manufacturing, logistics, or fulfillment operations

Collaboration model

Worked closely with:

Key decisions & initiatives

Conversion-first focus

The conversion funnel was redesigned to prioritize:

  • Short-term conversions
  • Personalized lead capture
  • Clear commercial intent

Generic newsletter-driven engagement was deprioritized in favor of measurable conversion paths.

Product–marketing alignment

A central strategic shift was required:

  • Moving away from exclusively configurable products
  • Introducing standard collections and pre-configurations
  • Enabling linkable, comparable products for channels like Google Shopping

This decision traded pure customization for marketability and sales readiness.

Trade-offs

  • Reduced emphasis on full customization
  • Increased focus on standardized offerings that could be marketed efficiently

The trade-off was intentional: enabling sales first, customization second.

What was tested, killed, and doubled down on

Doubled down on

  • Influencer marketing in NL and DK
  • Website and category page optimization to improve first impressions and navigation

Identified for change

  • The existing agency setup
  • The lack of proactive, solution-driven marketing execution from the project leadThese were identified as structural blockers to achieving the desired outcomes.

Outcomes (current state)

  • The international market entry was successfully launched
  • Initial customer acquisition and engagement targets were reached
  • The core challenge shifted from generating demand to converting demand into profitable sales

The project resulted in:

  • A clear strategic roadmap
  • Explicit identification of product presentation as the main sales bottleneck
  • The foundation for a follow-up strategy session to fundamentally restructure the setup

Lessons learned

What I would repeat

  • Early alignment of product strategy with marketing channel requirements
  • Treating marketability as a first-class constraint, not an afterthought

What I would do differently

  • Address role misalignment and lack of execution ownership earlier

What others can learn

For high-value, highly configurable products, marketing-channel fit is as critical as product quality.

A strong marketing plan cannot compensate for a product structure that cannot be efficiently promoted.

Subscribe to Remco Livain

Don’t miss out on the latest issues. Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
jamie@example.com
Subscribe